|
|
Post by Creshosk on Jul 21, 2006 23:06:36 GMT -5
 Okay, last time I checked Sailor Moon is not a religion, I don't see how you have to insult us by assuming your Presumption of what Cartoon Network is thinking, went over our heads. Uh, you need to chill. This coming from a person who is upset over a parody or two of Sailor Moon? First, I wasn't talking to you or anyone else when I said that, I was talking to Creshosk. On a public Message board where what you say is visable for everyone to see and comment on. And second, that wasn't an insult. I wasn't insulting you or anyone else or Creshosk when I said that. Affirmative, I remain uninsulted from your statements. Saying that something possibly went over someones head is saying that they may have missed the point of what I was trying to say. In which case you might need to think about making your points more clear. No one is perfect, its not impossible to misunderstand something, it happens to the best of us. Illogical behavior of people acting serious confounds me the most for example. This is a false assumption on your part. CN actually did try to make Sailor Moon work on their network. Then you are in contradiction of yourself. If they tried to make it work then how would it be they who are refusing us? Counterpoint: if they tried to make it work but was out of their hands would not showing Sailor Moon in any way shape or form show that they want to show Sailor Moon to the fans? And I do infact know how the ratings of Sailor Moon were, and I know why CN pulled it. Negative. Your statements clearly indicate that you have little to no grasp of the way the business works. But that was besides the entire point. Negative. It was indicative to the conversation that all facts be concidered in drawing a valid conclusion on the matter. Disregarding information because it does not suit your point should clearly indicate that it is your point that is invalid. Don't make assumptions on things you know nothing about, or in this case, me. Observation: You have made assumptions on things that you show you do not understand. Assesment: Do not lecture others on mistakes you make yourself. As I said one post earlier, I don't care about this whole thing anymore, Actions speak louder than words. To this end if you do not care about the subject why bother responding? and I didn't care that much when I posted this. Negative. Assertation is common among people who are backed into a corner and wish to change the way in which they are precieved. I just make a thread about this 'cause I thought it was interesting and I wanted to show you all. Negative. You would have had a neutral or positive message if you have a neutral or positive attitude toward a subject. A negative message is a clear indicator of a negative attitude toward the subject in question. The whole "I'm so pissed I'm gonna explode" was just a damn act that I wanted to pull. A joke. I thought that was glaringly obvious. Negative. If it had been a joke you would not have rebuttled my points. As for easing up, who was the one who took my words so seriously as to make a post in which they said I insulted everyone, and called me a slandering biased religious-like Sailor Moon fan? Who was it that continued to post negative assertations of the situation with Cartoon Network? If anyone needed to "ease up", it was you. Negative. Your attituded towards Kabal indicates hostility. Hostility indicates that you are not relaxed. No shit Sherlock. And it was not a theory. It was an obvious (or so I thought until I read your post) joke, and even if it wasn't a joke, in my last post I also said, "I just thought of it as...", hence that its my personal thinking, not a theory. Negtive, Backtracking by claiming something is a joke is evident. Wrong. CN did infact create and write the show Megas XLR, Negative Megas XLR was created by: Kelsey Mann Sue Perrotto Chris Prynoski Writing credits (in alphabetical order) Jack Alvino writer Zeke Kamm writer Michael Kramer writer George Krstic co-creator George Krstic writer Alain Matz head writer Jack Monaco writer Ford Riley freelance writer Jody Schaeffer co-creator which was one of the two Sailor Moon parody shows. It doesn't make Robot Chicken though. So before slandering me, use actual facts as opposed to false ones. Reassertation: Do not lecture others on things you yourself are guilty of. Contradiction detected: You previously asserted that MegasXLR was an acceptable parody. You asserted that Cartoon network was rubbing in our faces that they no longer run sailor moon. You responses contradict your previous assertations. My "beef" isn't actual beef anyway. I have no grudge with them. And even if I did, its not that serious to contact the creatures about it. Query in your statment "its not that serious to contact the creatures about it." Whom is indicated by the noun creatures? Or did you read my posts and somehow come up with the assumption that I was planning to throw a revolt against CN or the parody's creatures? Observation: the noun creatures has been used a second time. From this context one can conclude you are using creatures to indicate the Characters within the parody this leads me to inquire how you would have no trouble contacting the fictional characters? And besides, if you cannot laugh at what you love, then you are in a religion XD A) Matter of opinion Negative Research definition of "Relgion" B) For the record, I didn't laugh at the Robot Chicken parody cause I thought it was plain stupid. I did, however, laugh at the Megas parody when I saw it. Observation: You once again indicate that MegasXLR that you previously asserted was made by cartoon network was acceptable. You again indicate that the paraody in RobotChicken, which you asserted was not made by Cartoon Network is unacceptable. Queary: How is Cartoon Network rubbing in our faces that they no longer air sailor moon from the usage of the parody that they do not control? |
|
|
|
Post by Zyppora on Jul 22, 2006 9:01:51 GMT -5
Cresh, I think with 'creatures', he means 'creators', as in the creators of the parodies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder Clap Zap on Jul 22, 2006 12:07:43 GMT -5
Neither was I. I was talking about in the stance of a creator not a character. k Who exactly ARE you talking about? Naoko, if she were to have seen the parodies You created a thread just so you could complain about something that you personally did not like. No Not only do you fail to grasp the concept of who's in charge of making the shows, and who runs them? Wrong Cartoon network airs the episodes of Robot Chicken, but independant artists are in charage of its creation. This should be fairly obvious from the fact that some of their shows have aired on other channels. Such as Family guy and Furturama airring on Fox. I is not the broadcasting company that creates the shows. Knew that, thanks anyway Yes, the creators of the paradys can be argued as being fans. Oh really? Nice, but I think you knew what I meant when I said that Or you know they had no new material to run, and can only show reruns so often before the fans stop watching, the ratings go down, the comercials that are shown don't do as well. So they pull a show in favor of showing another show to gain the extra attention on the commercials. That's how they make their money. k... I bet You have evidence of this? Nope So why are you complaining? Their hands are tied. Whos complaining? As is their right since it is their channel, If Sailor Moon was not profitable to them why show it? Never said they should of I assume you mean its not under their control in creating it Also not under their control. The writers behind Robot chicken and Megas XLR decided to parody Sailor Moon. Normally this sort of publicity iis a good thing. I'm aware CN was not actually behind the parodying, thanks Yes, ignorance does tend to lead one to jump to false conclusions. Yes, and this isnt one of those cases Or maybe they had no direct control over the exact content that goes into the shows. Wasn't being literal there Again failing to understand how things work. again, They contract out a season of episodes from the producers of the shows, who in turn hire writers to write relevent material for the show. Nice, but it has nothing to do with the meaning behind my intentions when I posted that. Then why comment on it adnd call it sad if you don't care? Cause I wanted to, obviously. Me not caring about it =/= not having an opinion and throwing it out Cresh, I think with 'creatures', he means 'creators', as in the creators of the parodies. Oh crap. *hits forehead* I didn't catch those. |
|
|
|
Post by Creshosk on Jul 23, 2006 1:09:20 GMT -5
Yes you did, and lying about the matter does not help. Not in the slightest. Your first post in this thread is quite evident of the fact. You did not. Again Lying about your ignorance does not help you. Again your first post is evidence. Oh really? Nice, but I think you knew what I meant when I said that You tend to think alot of things that are not true don't you? Then your claims cannot be verified, in which case I offically request that you stop spreading disinformation. You were again, as evidenced by your first post. Never said they should of Yes you did, lying about your actions does not help your case. I assume you mean its not under their control in creating it I mean its not under the control of Cartoon network that the creators of Robot chicken or MegasXLR decided to make a spoof of Sailor Moon. I'm aware CN was not actually behind the parodying, thanks Do you realize this now? Because you did not at the begining of the thread. Yes, and this isnt one of those cases Yes it is, and I request you stop lying. Wasn't being literal there Backpeddling doesn't help your case. Nice, but it has nothing to do with the meaning behind my intentions when I posted that. Again lying about your intentions does not help you. Cause I wanted to, obviously. Me not caring about it =/= not having an opinion and throwing it out Incorrect. You only form opinion on things you care about. If you didn't care you wouldn't care enough to form an opinion. Again backpeddling will not help your case. Cresh, I think with 'creatures', he means 'creators', as in the creators of the parodies. Oh crap. *hits forehead* I didn't catch those. [/quote]Obviously. |
|
|
|
Post by yatenkou on Jul 23, 2006 12:59:31 GMT -5
ALLRIGHT this is a silly argument.
WHO THE F--- cares if they parodied Sailor Moon? I AM GLAD THEY DID. Why?
It generates interest in the series you tards. Do you want Sailor Moon to slip into oblivion? I didn't think so. Then stop being so damn hypersensitive "OMG WTF SAILOR MOON BEING PARODIED I MUST STOP THIS MADNESS" - because you are just facilitating the entropy of Sailor Moon.
So really who is doing the series the worst damage? You and your promotion to knock the series out of the public eye - or them and their generating interest in the serious and making quite a few good jokes along the way?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kabal on Jul 23, 2006 16:06:47 GMT -5
Ummm there was only one person here bashing the parodies, Yaten XD, that be TCZ *points* XD
|
|
|
|
Post by Sailor Earth on Jul 23, 2006 17:43:05 GMT -5
Yet again you voice my thoughts  |
|
|
|
Post by Thunder Clap Zap on Jul 23, 2006 19:32:03 GMT -5
What the heck? I wasn't lying in any of my responses. You can backtrack and get stuff from my previous posts all you want, but I already said that that was an act, but according to you I was lying about that too. Its not me lying, its you not believing me for whatever reason. Just cause you dont believe me doesn't mean I was lying. I wasn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Creshosk on Jul 23, 2006 19:41:00 GMT -5
What the heck? I wasn't lying in any of my responses. Yeah you did. You can backtrack and get stuff from my previous posts all you want, but I already said that that was an act, That's where you were lying. You were also backpedlding because you were backed into a corner. But rather than own up to it you lied and said that it was a joke. but according to you I was lying about that too. Its not me lying, its you not believing me for whatever reason. Because I'm not gullible enough to believe the lies you offer me. I don't beleive you because you're lying. Just cause you dont believe me doesn't mean I was lying. No, you lying means you were lying, and that leads me to not blelieve you. not the other way around. Yeah. You were. |
|
|
|
Post by Thunder Clap Zap on Jul 23, 2006 20:03:18 GMT -5
I wasn't lying. Its not about being gullible. This is nothing but:
You dont believe = I'm lying
|
|
|
|
Post by yatenkou on Jul 23, 2006 20:28:16 GMT -5
Ummm there was only one person here bashing the parodies, Yaten XD, that be TCZ *points* XD Kabal - i said tard(s) PLURAL because I'm sure there is more then one TCZ-tard hanging around that is cheering him on even secretly. Where there is one tard there are more - it's like cockroaches. Merc - I'm good at doing that hehehe. |
|
|
|
Post by Creshosk on Jul 23, 2006 21:12:48 GMT -5
I wasn't lying. Its not about being gullible. This is nothing but: You dont believe = I'm lying No this is you lying= I don't believe you. I'm not so foolish to beleive your garbage. Get it? You lied first, which lead to me not beleiveing you. |
|
|
|
Post by Zyppora on Jul 24, 2006 1:45:47 GMT -5
You two are off on some personal retorting and I'm stopping it now. If we can't get this thread back ontopic, I'll close it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kabal on Jul 24, 2006 12:31:28 GMT -5
*In response to yaten* Ohhhhhh Okay XP
Gomen nasai ^^;;
|
|
|
|
Post by Sailor Earth on Jul 24, 2006 17:30:51 GMT -5
You two are off on some personal retorting and I'm stopping it now. If we can't get this thread back ontopic, I'll close it. Hmm yes I'm inclined to agree with this statement. Take it to PMs if you must continue your little argument, but drop it from the thread, all right? |
|
Okay, last time I checked Sailor Moon is not a religion, I don't see how you have to insult us by assuming your Presumption of what Cartoon Network is thinking, went over our heads.
